Seed grants are awarded with funding provided by the Binghamton University Road Map through the Provost's Office and the Division of Research.
The goal of these seed grants is to encourage faculty to develop collaborative projects that stimulate the advancement of new ideas that can build Binghamton University's expertise toward a national reputation in the broad area of citizenship, rights and cultural belonging. This competitive, peer-reviewed program is providing initial support for proposed long-term programs of collaborative research that have strong potential to attract external funding.
The call for proposals for seed grant funding for the 2020–2021 academic year, including an overview, an explanation of the process and eligibility, a proposal cover page and a proposal budget page is available on this website. The deadline to apply for a Citizenship, Rights and Cultural Belonging TAE seed grant is March 1, 2020.
For the 2018–2019 academic year, the following seed grants were awarded:
Technologies of Human Rights Representatives - a SUNY Conversation
Alexandra Moore, English, and John Cheng, Asian and Asian American studies
With the support of the TAE in Citizenship, Rights, and Cultural Belonging, the Human Rights Institute will organize an ambitious two-day conference on Technologies of Human Rights Representation - A SUNY Conversation in spring 2019. The goals of the conference are to: showcase the excellent, sustained, and transdisciplinary work currently undertaken by Binghamton University faculty and to underscore its leadership within the SUNY system in human rights-related research; to bring scholars from different disciplines, schools, and universities together to share and discuss the challenges of making our different quantitative and qualitative methodologies legible to one another; and to explore new conceptual and technological frontiers in human rights representations. This conference will also provide a forum for leading human rights scholars at Binghamton and within the SUNY system to share research, with an eye toward the development of future collaborative projects, and for students to be exposed to the breadth of work in this field. Selected conference presentations will be chosen for expansion and inclusion in a volume, edited by Alexandra Moore, also entitled Technologies of Human Rights Representation. Professor Moore has an advance contract for this volume from SUNY Press.
Human Trafficking Data Project
Suzy Lee, human development, Olubunmi Oyewuwo-Gassikia, social work, Charles Hounmenou, social work, and David Cingranelli, political science
The Human Trafficking Data Project proposes to create a large-scale dataset on human trafficking in the U.S., using the data gathered by the Department of State through its T-visa application process. Each year, nearly a thousand individuals apply for immigration relief through the T-visa, which provides non-immigrant visa status to victims of 'a severe form of trafficking.' These applications present a publically available record of human trafficking incidents that include not only basic demographic data, but detailed accounts of life histories and the circumstances of the trafficking itself. The project will address the long-standing problem of sparse data in anti-human-trafficking scholarship and policy-making. Our goal is to provide a better picture of human trafficking in the U.S., and to create a dataset that scholars and activists can use to test theories and propose interventions.
Race, Economic Disadvantage, and Out-of-School Suspensions: Data, Dialogue and Opportunities for Reform
Sean Massey, women, gender and sexuality studies, and Mei-Hsiu Chen, mathematical sciences
Racial disproportionality in school discipline is a pervasive problem throughout the U.S. (Annamma, Morrison, & Jackson, 2014) and may widen the achievement gap (Gregory, Skiba, & Noguera, 2010), increase students' risk of dropping out entirely, and even accelerate entry into the school to prison pipeline (Krueger, 2010). Although research points to the role that overt and implicit bias play in the disciplinary process (Carter, Skiba, Arredondo, & Pollock, 2017), it has had a limited impact on disciplinary policies and practices. Teachers and administrators frequently resist suggestions that racial bias plays a role in their own disciplinary practices (Skiba, Poloni-Staudinger, Simmons, Feggins-Azziz, & Chung, 2005), pointing instead to the other variables like poverty (Skiba & Williams, 2014). This project uses statistical methods to estimate rates of racial dispropotionality in out-of-school suspensions in New York state, after adjusting for the effects of poverty. It then uses these findings to explore policymaker and stakeholder resistance to these findings, with the ultimate objectives of (a) developing a theoretical model for disciplinary process that identifies standard practices and highlights areas where racial bias may enter that process, and (b) utilize this information to develop, implement, and evaluate a research-based intervention aimed at reducing racial disproportionality in disciplinary practices in schools.