The Binghamton University Foundation strongly supports the ongoing efforts of Binghamton
University to reduce the carbon footprint of the campus toward the goal of carbon
neutrality by 2050.
The University has made sustainability a priority. The University defines sustainability
broadly to encompass human outcomes as well as environmental ones.
As applied by Binghamton University, sustainability is about meeting the needs of
humanity in the present without negatively impacting future generations from meeting
their needs due to environmental destruction. As such, sustainability has social equity,
economic and environmental dimensions.
The University reports on its efforts in the areas of research, academics, infrastructure,
and policies and practice to address sustainability concerns, and supports that reporting
with data that the University reports to (and which data is evaluated by) the Association
for Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) (to which 989 colleges
and universities now report data). The University’s sustainability progress is available
online.
The University was one of the first campuses to sign the President’s Climate Commitment
and has had a Climate Action Plan since 2009. The University also has been listed
in the Princeton Review Guide for 334 Green Colleges every year since 2009.
In addition to responding to climate change, the University has applied supply chain
sustainability and human rights standards to apparel and other purchases by the University.
The Foundation has received inquiries about whether it weighs nonfinancial factors
into its investment decisions. This raises two issues that universities across the country have been addressing:
university disassociation policies and so-called “ESG” investing.
- Disassociation policies mandate that if a university decides not to invest in a particular
company or practice that it do so by fully disassociating the university (including
its foundation) with that company or practice. If a university determines that, on
balance, it cannot fully disassociate itself without harming the university or its
mission, then it will not take that action. The Foundation raises funds and provides
support to advance the purpose and mission of the University. At this time, the University
does not have a disassociation policy. If the University adopted that kind of policy,
the Foundation would work with the University to understand the investment-related
costs and risks associated with any specific disassociation proposal that the University
might consider.
- ESG investing uses established environmental (“E”), social (“S”), and governance (“G”)
criteria to assess potential investments. Although ESGs are important to society,
there has been a great deal of debate about whether so-called ESG investing requires
investors to give up potential investment benefits, and if so, how much. This information
is important to the Foundation as stewards of the University’s endowment, including
as it makes decisions about both investment managers and investment fund opportunities.
The Foundation board has instructed its investment committee to gather and report
on information from its investment manager about sustainability ratings, and the potential
costs and impacts associated with ESG investing, including so that the investment
committee can take that information into account in making its decisions.